The High Court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the Criminal Revision application and dismissed the same as withdrawn. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Permission to withdraw with the application was granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.149 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- East Champaran
======================================================
Md. Shahabuddin Khan @ Shahabuddin Khan, Son of Nejabul Khan, Resident of Village- Shripur Kabaiya (Sripur Kawaiya), P.S.- Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
Heena Khatoon @ Hena Khatoon, Wife of Shahabuddin Khan @ Md. Shahabuddin Khan, Resident of Village - Shripur Kabaiya (Sripur Kawaiya), P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran Presently Daughter of Mainuddin Khan, Resident of Village- Pakariya Paithan Patti, P.S.- Darpa, District- East Champaran
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 08-12-2023
At the outset, Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw with this application.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
lekhi/-
U
Md. Shahabuddin Khan
Heena Khatoon
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
