In this criminal revision, the Patna High Court permitted petitioners to convert their application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after obtaining no objection from opposite parties, with a direction to correct defects within four weeks.
Permission granted to convert application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.; defect removal within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.1020 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
7 07-12-2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to allow
him to convert this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection
to the same.
3. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to convert this application in an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The Office shall do the stamp reporting and learned counsel for the petitioners shall remove the defect, if any, thereafter within a period of four weeks.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
SUSHMA2/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are permitted to convert their application into one filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jitendra Prasad Singh
Satyendra Kumar
Amarendra Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rameshwar Prasad Singh
Mohan Kumar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
