In a criminal revision application arising from a police station case, the Single Judge of the Patna High Court dismissed the petition. The petitioner did not appear, and the respondents' failure to prosecute resulted in the dismissal of the application.
The instant revision application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.1455 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2014 Thana- BAIKUNTHPUR District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Bhagirath Mahato@Bhagrith Mahato S/o Late Pardeshi Mahato, R/o Vill.Khazuhatti Tola Dayagir, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
non-prosecution.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
pravinkumar/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision application should be admitted in the absence of the petitioner and due to non-prosecution by the respondents.
Bhagirath Mahato
The State Of Bihar
Kisnath Rai
Bhola Rai
Umesh Rai
Shiv Nath Rai
Bibeek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
