Allowed

Siyaram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2023CR. MISC./64990/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Honourable Mr. Justice Bibeek Chaudhuri granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 447, and others of the IPC, holding the incident arose from a longstanding land dispute and mutual fighting.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to be released on bail within six weeks upon furnishing bond and sureties and complying with specified conditions.

Siyaram Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64990 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2022 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SIYARAM YADAV son of Late Kusum Lal Yadav Village- Kupari W.No-2, Ps- Raniganj Dist- Araria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhav Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajiv Nayan ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 08-12-2023

¶12

Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and

¶13

the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

¶15

connection with Raniganj P. S. Case No. 310 of 2022, dated 02.09.2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307, 337, 338, 354(B), 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The petitioner is a relative of the informant. A longstanding land dispute has been going on between the parties. Over the said dispute, an incident of mutual fighting took place which gave rise to the instant case as well as a counter case.

¶17

Considering the materials on record as well as

¶18

the case-diary, though the learned APP has raised objection,

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64990 of 2023(3) dt.08-12-2023 2/2

¶20

I am inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶21

Accordingly, prayer for bail is allowed.

¶22

The petitioner, above-named, is directed to be

¶23

released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, one of whom must be a local surety with landed property, to the satisfaction of the Ld. SDJM, Araria, in connection with Raniganj P. S. Case No. 310 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. with further condition that he must comply the conditions, namely, he would not persuade or threaten the witnesses and would be present in the court below during trial on all dates.

¶24

Failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with any of the above directions will entail the learned court below to cancel the bail without any further order.

¶25

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶26

skm/- U

Siyaram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Siyaram Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dilkhush Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar @ Satendara Kumar @ Satendra Kumar @ Surendra Dusad Vs the State of Bihar

Janak Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Biswas @ Biru @ Shivam Jewellars Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar