Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal revision application; the court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the revision application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.1451 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2014 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Kishanganj
======================================================
Abdul Razzaque S/o Late Jasimuddin, R/o Vill.- Teusa, P.S and DistrictKishangan.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Diwakar Sinha, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binod Kumar 2, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner as well as
learned APP for the State.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
uttam/-
U
Abdul Razzaque
State Of Bihar
Akhtar Alam
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
