The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed Criminal Revision No. 101 of 2019 because the petitioner applied for withdrawal and expressed lack of desire to proceed with the revision.
The instant revision is dismissed being withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.101 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District-
======================================================
Ganpat Patel Late Maya Patel Resident of Village-Durgaulia, P.S. Shikarpur, Dist, West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate Ms. Bharti Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
12 15-12-2023 On the instruction of the petitioner, it is submitted
by the learned Advocate that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the instant revision and he likes to withdraw the same.
being withdrawn.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
uttam/-
Ganpat Patel
Sinju Devi @ Sindhu Devi
Nitish Kumar
Puja Kumari
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
