Arun Kumar Sharma v. the State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought withdrawal of the petition; permission granted and petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9420 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1383 Year-2019 Thana- SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Samastipur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
to withdraw the petition.
Permission accorded.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Neha/-
U T
Arun Kumar Sharma
Rajeev Gupta
The State of Bihar
Kaushal Prasad Singh
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court