Disposed
Lavkush Anupam v. The State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./8986/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8986 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-637 Year-2018 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
LAVKUSH ANUPAM Son of Late Lakshman Singh Resident of VillageAkhlaspur, P.S.- Bhabua, District- Kaimur, Bhabua
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 25-04-2023 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed for quashing the order
dated 09.08.2018 passed by C.J.M. Kaimur, Bhabua in Complaint Case No. 1095 of 2018 in exercise of power conferred under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. and consequently proceedings arising therefrom including registration of F.IR. Bearing Bhabua P.S. Case No. 637 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 120B and 34 of the I.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute vide Compromise petition dated 26.07.2022 (Annexure-2) and the OP No. 2 has filed the compromise petition and withdrawal petition in the Court below.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8986 of 2023(2) dt.25-04-2023 2/2
In view of the aforesaid fact, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the case pending here and also in the Court below.
Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to consider the truthfulness of the compromise petition from the O.P. No. 2 and in case the O.P. No. 2 supports the compromise petition, the proceeding should be dropped against the persons with whom he has entered into compromise. If the compromise petition is not supported by the O.P. No. 2 then appropriate order be passed.
The Court below must pass an order on the compromise petition within 15 days from the date of communication of a receipt of this order.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application is disposed of.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash criminal proceedings and FIR on account of compromise accepted by the complainant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lavkush Anupam
The State of Bihar
Ravish Kumar Singh
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court