Oral order dismissing the criminal miscellaneous application for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in person or through counsel to press the application on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8471 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2019 Thana- MANSAHI District- Katihar
======================================================
ROHIT KUMAR BHUIYA @ ROHIT BHUIYA Son of Ram Lakhan Bhuiya Resident of Mansahi, Hari Prasad, P.S.- Mansahi, District - Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
9 16-01-2023
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press
this application.
On the previous occasion i.e. on 02.01.2023, no one turned up on behalf of the petitioner.
In such view of the matter, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
shailendra/-
U T
Rohit Kumar Bhuiya @ Rohit Bhuiya
The State of Bihar
Puja Devi
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
