Bail application under Sections 302 and 201/34 IPC in a Jaynagar murder case; the petitioner's earlier reasoned application had been dismissed on merit. The court found nothing new warranting reconsideration and rejected the petition as without merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7874 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2021 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani
====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR YADAV Son of Dilip Yadav R/V- Pithwa Tol, P.SDeodha, Dist- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 08-02-2023
The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 246 of 2021 (G.R. No. 651 of 2021) for the offences under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
A reasoned order was passed on merit and was dismissed on 10.8.2022.
Nothing new has come in the petition to warrant any
new look.
The petition is without merit and accordingly rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ajay Singh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in judicial custody in Jaynagar PS Case No. 246 of 2021 for offences under Sections 302, 201/34 IPC, given a prior dismissal on merits.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
