A petitioner's counsel reported he received no instruction and could not press the matter further; the High Court dismissed the application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7848 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-770 Year-2019 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
KRISHNA KUMAR RAM Son of Subash Ram Resident of Village-Lahera, P.S.-Karaghar, District-Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
6 17-05-2023 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits
that despite his best efforts he is not receiving any instruction in the matter, and as such, he is not in position to press the matter any further.
In view of the above, the application stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
mcv/-
U T
Krishna Kumar Ram
The State of Bihar
Sandhya Kumari
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
