The Patna High Court granted bail to the accused in a criminal complaint involving offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Domestic Violence Act, citing Supreme Court directives to release the petitioner immediately.
Bail granted on furnishing bonds of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties each and undertaking to comply with trial conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78246 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-601 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada
======================================================
Rahul Kumar S/o Ashok Chauhan R/o Village- Koniya P.S.- Khizarsarai, Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Partys
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
2 04-12-2023
Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
arises out of F.I.R., bearing Complaint Case No. 601 of 2018 dated 04.09.2023, for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 504, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of D.P. Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78246 of 2023(2) dt.04-12-2023 2/2
on 31.07.2023, this Court is of the view that the petitioner should be released on bail immediately.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
shweta/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused should be released on bail immediately in light of Supreme Court precedents regarding Section 498A offences?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of BiharDistinguished¶18
Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
Md. Asfak Alam Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.Referred¶18
Md. Asfak Alam Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Cr. Appeal No. 2207 of 2023
3 provisions across 3 enactments
RAHUL KUMAR
THE STATE OF BIHAR
KABITA DEVI
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
