Dismissed

Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2023CR. MISC./78161/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, in judicial custody since September 2023, sought regular bail in a case involving alleged attempt to murder and grievous hurt. The High Court rejected the bail application, citing the serious nature of the charges and the dispute between parties, while directing the trial court to expedite proceedings within one year.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; trial directed to be expedited for disposal within one year.

Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78161 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-327 Year-2009 Thana- Turkauliya District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav Son of Thaga Rai @ Thagu Rai, Resident of Village - Gokhula, P.S. - Banjariya, District - East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 04-12-2023

¶9

Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶10

The instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application arises out of F.I.R., bearing Sessions Trial No.622 of 2023 arising out of Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 327 of 2009 lodged on 15.12.2009 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

¶11

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on the following grounds:-

¶12

(i) The petitioner has been implicated in the case under

¶13

Section 307, 504 of I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

(ii) Petitioner is in judicial custody since 16.09.2023.

¶15

(iii) It is alleged against the petitioner that he open

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78161 of 2023(2) dt.04-12-2023 2/2

¶17

fired upon the informant causing gun shot injury on his back.

¶18

(iv) Both the parties have landed property dispute and there is a case and counter case are pending between both the parties. Therefore, the petitioner should be released on bail.

¶19

I have carefully considered the documents annexed with the instant application. It is not in dispute that the informant received gun shot injury on the date of occurrence and the said gun shot injury was inflicted by none other than the petitioner

¶20

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has raised objection against the prayer for bail.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage, in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 327 of 2009 pending in the court of learned A.D.J.-21, Motihari, East Champaran.

¶22

Prayer for bail is thus, rejected.

¶23

Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial

¶24

and trying to dispose of the case as early as possible preferably within a period of one year.

¶25

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶26

mdrashid/-

¶27

U T

Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumra Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Sah Vs The State of Bihar