case. The whole occurrence took place during a period of more than four months and the prosecution story is not believable at all. The daughter of the informant is not minor and her medical examination shows that her age was assessed to be 18 to 20 years. She went on her own with the petitioner and both of them solemnized marriage at Samastipur and thereafter she was taken to Ambala where the petitioner and the daughter of the informant stayed for quite sometime. During this period of four months, no alarm was raised by the informant’s daughter. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner and daughter of the informant were called by the informant and his family members to reconcile the matter, but the daughter of the informant was put under pressure and a false case was lodged against the petitioner and others. The police, after investigation, submitted final form against other co-accused persons finding no involvement of those persons in the alleged occurrence. The allegation of rape and the sexual assault is not believable and from the facts and circumstances, it is clear that no offence under Section 376 of IPC is made out against the petitioner. Moreover, the daughter of the informant refused to undergo medical examination, which falsifies the allegation of sexual assault. The petitioner has got no criminal history and he is in