who disclosed the names of several persons including this petitioner. Allegedly, recovery of a mobile phone was made from the house of the petitioner at the instance of the co-accused Mohit Kumar, who stated that he had given mobile phone to the petitioner for selling it. Otherwise there is nothing to show against the petitioner in the alleged occurrence. Moreover, only four miscreants are said to be involved in the occurrence, whereas a large number of persons have been dragged in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. The learned counsel further submits that a large number of coaccused persons have been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 21.07.2023, 21.07.2023, 14.07.2023 and 05.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos.44260 of 2023, 43686 of 2023, 41198 of 2023, 62473 of 2023, respectively. The learned counsel further submits that neither the petitioner nor the mobile phone was put to Test Identification Parade. The petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2023 and the charge sheet has been submitted in this case. The petitioner is having clean antecedent.