Dipak Pandey v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Miscellaneous petition dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already been convicted in the concluded trial.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed.
Criminal Miscellaneous petition dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already been convicted in the concluded trial.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70796 of 2022
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19199 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-715 Year-2021 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad
======================================================
DIPAK PANDEY Son of Gangadhar Pandey R/v- Saidabad, P.S.- Pali, District- Jehanabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 11-01-2023
Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the petition has become infructuous in view of the fact that the trial has been concluded and the petitioner stands convicted.
In view of the aforesaid submission put forward by him, the petition stands dismissed.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U T
Dipak Pandey
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court