Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging he ran his flour mill on an disconnected electricity connection, causing assessed revenue loss of Rs. 2,29,430/-. The court found an FIR with allegations against him and declined relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23380 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2021 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
SANJIV KUMAR Son of Sri Ramdev Mandal Resident of village - Tarwa, P.S. - Pirpainti, District - Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Navjot Yeshu, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
4 11-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
State.
The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 234 of 2021 under section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
As per the prosecution story, the allegation is that the Junior Engineer along with employees of the Electricity Department inspected the premises of the petitioner and it was found that earlier due to non-payment, the electricity with regard to his commercial use of flour mill was disconnected still he was using the same and accordingly, it was alleged that total revenue loss to the theft of electricity is to the tune of Rs. 2,29,430/-.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23380 of 2022(4) dt.11-01-2023 2/2
premises/flour mill as also the meter does not belong to him and as such he is not liable to pay the aforesaid amount nor there has been any electricity theft on his part.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf opposite party no.2 on the other hand submits that precisely that is the case of State that despite electricity being disconnected, he was running his flour mill causing revenue loss to the tune of Rs. 2,29,430/-.
Be that as it may, the fact remains that there is an FIR in which allegation has been levelled against the petitioner that he was illegally running the flour mill without having any electricity connection and that way in the FIR, assessed has been Rs. 2,29,430/-.
In the aforesaid background, this Court is not inclined to grant him relief and the petition as such stands rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case of alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjiv Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
