Allowed

Md. Ilyas @ Md. Iliyas v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2023CR. MISC./6977/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a rape-on-false-pretext-of-marriage case involving POCSO charges. Considering custody since September 2022 and facts of the case, the court enlarged petitioner on bail with bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount to Additional Sessions Judge-VII cum Special Judge POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari.

Md. Ilyas @ Md. Iliyas Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6977 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2021 Thana- MAHESI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Ilyas @ Md. Iliyas Son Of Abdul Sattar R/V- Motijhil Chaklalu P.SMahesi, Dist- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 12-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 313, 341, 323, 376, 379, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

¶14

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he committed rape with the victim on false pretext of marriage. It is further alleged that when the victim went to family members of the petitioner for the purpose of marriage they also assaulted her.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As per statement of the victim, it appears that both parties are

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6977 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 2/2

¶17

consensual parties and he has falsely been implicated in this case due to enmity. As per injury report which is annexed with case diary wherein, doctor opined injury sustained by injured is simple in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 12.09.2022.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mehsi P.S. Case No. 39 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIIcum Special Judge POCSO Act, East Champaran, Motihari.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

lata/-

¶22

U T

Md. Ilyas @ Md. Iliyas v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Ilyas @ Md. Iliyas v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudarshan @ Sudarsan Ram @ Sudarsan @ Sudrashan Kahar Vs The State of Bihar

Anjum @ Anjum Adil @ Anjum Adhil Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Irfan @ Khonua Vs The State of Bihar

Dhirendra Paswan @ Dhiraj Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar