Dismissed

Ritik Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2023CR. MISC./6893/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court denied the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail. The facts included allegations of hacking and sharing edited photos and MMS. The court ordered that bail might be considered if the petitioner surrenders within six weeks and approaches the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail rejected. Petitioner given six weeks to surrender for consideration of regular bail.

Ritik Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6893 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-680 Year-2022 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ritik Yadav Son Of Sri Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar R/O Vill.- Naya Tola, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 19-06-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 379, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 (D) of the I.T. Act.

¶14

As per FIR, the petitioner used old Instagram I.D./Account of the informant by hacking it and sent request to her relatives and shared her edited photos and MMS with them.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the informant is a girl of questionable character and so many persons are related with her as she is a student of Cimage College S.K. Puri, Patna. He submits that the informant has also brought a case bearing Danapur P.S. Case No. 580 of 2022 against the petitioner and same has been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6893 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 2/2

¶17

compromised. He submits that the petitioner has also filed an informatory petition no. 510 of 2022 dated 13.04.2022 against the present informant and her father before the learned A.C.J.M.-I Danapur, Patna. He further submits that petitioner has three criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

¶18

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is also involved in the present case.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 680 of 2022.

¶20

However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day without being prejudiced by this order.

¶21

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶22

devendra/-

¶23

U T

Ritik Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritik Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kameshwar Basak Vs The State of Bihar

Vimla Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar Yadav @ Nitesh Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar