Allowed

Sunil Rajvanshi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2023CR. MISC./6811/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a prohibition case where 80 liters of wine were recovered from motorcycles. The petitioner, with no criminal antecedents and no incriminating evidence against him, was granted bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C., to appear within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, conditioned to appear within twelve weeks.

Sunil Rajvanshi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6811 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2019 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUNIL RAJVANSHI, Son of Arjun Rajvanshi R/V- Jobkala, P.S- Akbarpur, Dist- Nawada

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-04-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶14

The prosecution case, in short, is that 80 liters wine is recovered.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that 80 liters wine is recovered from two different motorcycles. The name of the petitioner has transpired as being owner of one of the motorcycles in question. The said motorcycle was given by the petitioner to his co-villager for his personal use. The second motorcycle in question does not belong to the petitioner. Except for

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6811 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2

¶17

this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar).

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge-1st, Nawada in connection with Akbarpur P.S. case No. 465/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

Sunil Rajvanshi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Rajvanshi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharm Veer Singh Yadav @ Dhramveer Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Godwari Jha @ Godwari Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Samrin Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Naushad Vs the State of Bihar

Suman Kumar Singh @ Doctor Vs The State of Bihar

Sumitra Devi Vs The State of Bihar