Suo motu application filed to cancel anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party was dismissed finding no grounds based on Supreme Court precedents. Petitioner advised to approach Family Court for civil redressal.
Application for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed; petitioner directed to approach Family Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6155 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani
======================================================
GODWARI JHA @ GODWARI KUMARI W/o Ashish Kumar Jha Resident of Village- Denga, Western Toal, P.S.- Arer, District- Madhubani at present residing at Village- Bijalpura, P.S.- Arer, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
The present application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party No.2 by order dated 05.08.2021 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 33528 of 2021.
I find no ground for cancellation of anticipatory bail in the light of the judgments rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Dolat Ram and others Vs. State of Haryana reported in (1995) 1 SCC 349 , Abdul Basit @ Raju & Others Vs. Mohd. Abdul Kadir Chaudhary and Another reported in (2014) 10 SCC 754 and Jagjeet Singh and Others vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu and Another reported in (2022) 9
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6155 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2023 2/2
SCC 321.
The present cancellation application stands dismissed.
If so advised, the petitioner may file an application before the Family Court with a competent jurisdiction for redressal of her grievance.
If any such application is filed on behalf of the petitioner, same shall be disposed of expeditiously by the court of competent jurisdiction.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party No.2 should be cancelled.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dolat Ram and others Vs. State of HaryanaFollowed¶14
(1995) 1 SCC 349 · Who else cites this
Abdul Basit @ Raju & Others Vs. Mohd. Abdul Kadir Chaudhary and AnotherFollowed¶14
(2014) 10 SCC 754 · Who else cites this
Jagjeet Singh and Others vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu and AnotherFollowed¶14
(2022) 9 SCC 321 · Who else cites this
Godwari Jha @ Godwari Kumari W/o Ashish Kumar Jha
The State of Bihar
Ashish Kumar Jha
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
