Partly allowed

Chandan Mandal v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2023CR. MISC./62002/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from an FIR under sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the IPC for assault and attempt to murder, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners provided they surrendered within six weeks. The application for a third petitioner was withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner nos. 1 and 3 upon surrender and furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within six weeks; application of petitioner no. 2 withdrawn.

Chandan Mandal Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62002 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2023 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Mandal S/O Late Baso Mandal R/O Village- Morsanda, Ps. Falka, Dist. Katihar

¶5

Vikash Kumar S/O Manoj Mandal R/O Village- Chaundi Bandh Tola, Ps. Falka Dist. Katihar

¶6

Sintu Mandal @ Sintu Kumar S/O Late Malhoo Mandal @ Late Mallu Mandal R/O Village- Morsanda, Ps. Falka, Dist. Katihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Prasad Sah @ Baranwal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 13-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

¶16

petitioner no. 2 namely, Vikash Kumar has been arrested during the pendency of this anticipatory bail application.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the anticipatory bail application so far as it relates to petitioner no. 2.

¶18

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application with

¶19

regard to petitioner no. 2 is withdrawn as not pressed.

¶20

The petitioner nos. 1 and 3 apprehend arrest in

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62002 of 2023(3) dt.13-12-2023 2/3

¶22

connection with Falka P.S. Case No. 135 of 2023 dated 05.05.2023, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶23

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 05.05.2023, the informant namely, Neetu Devi went to the house of one Beero Mandal. In the meantime, Chandan Mandal assaulted her by iron rod, causing head injury. It has been alleged that during the course of occurrence five persons arrived at the place of occurrence by motorcycle and they also assaulted the informant and other persons of her family.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is specific allegation against petitioner no. 1, who is alleged to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod on her head. It is further stated that as per the injury report, the injury is found to be simple in nature. It is next submitted that there is no specific allegation against petitioner no. 3. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 have no criminal antecedents.

¶25

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶26

Having considered the facts and circumstances of

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62002 of 2023(3) dt.13-12-2023 3/3

¶28

the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner nos. 1 and 3 within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Falka P.S. Case No. 135 of 2023, petitioner no. 1 and 3 shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1^st Class, Katihar, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶29

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶30

Sankalp/-

¶31

U T

Chandan Mandal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Mandal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitender Kumar @ Jitender Prasad and Ors. Vs Bhola Mahto and Ors.

Madhav Mishra @ Madhavnand Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnandini Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shreekant Kumar Mandal @ Shreekant Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Kumar Vs the State of Bihar