Allowed

Rajnandini Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2023CR. MISC./63304/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to five petitioners faced with charges under Sections 341, 323, 307, and 504/34 IPC for assault and injury. The court ordered release upon arrest or surrender within six weeks upon furnishing bail bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties.

Rajnandini Kumari Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63304 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARIA District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajnandini Kumari, aged about 24 years (female), daughter of Shatrughna Sah,

¶5

Neelam Devi, aged about 46 years (female), wife of Shatrughna Sah,

¶6

Shatrughna Sah, aged about 56 years (Male), son of Shankar Sah,

¶7

Lal Babu Sah @ Lal Babu Kumar, aged about 28 years (Male), son of Shatrughna Sah,

¶8

Chhote Sah @ Chhotu Kumar, aged about 21 years (Male), son of Shatrughna Sah, All resident of village- Bishhar Asthan Naya Tola, Ward No. 18, PSFulwaria, Distt- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

============== Appearance :	========================================
For the Petitioner/s	: Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate Ms. Namita Sharma, Advocate
For the State	: Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP
For the Informant ==============	: Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Advocate ========================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 06-12-2023

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned

¶17

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant, who has appeared suo motu .

¶18

The petitioners apprehends arrest in connection with Fulwariya PS Case No.57 of 2023 dated 07.04.2023, instituted under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

The prosecution case, in short, is that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 abused the informant’s daughter and assaulted her

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63304 of 2023(3) dt.06-12-2023 2/3

¶21

by holding her hair. When the informant went there to save his daughter then other accused persons assaulted him with lathi , iron rod. Petitioner no.3 is alleged to have assaulted the informant with iron rod causing head injury. Petitioner no. 5 is alleged to have the informant’s wife on her head. Petitioner no. 4 is alleged to have assaulted the informant’s daughter on her head.

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. It is also submitted that both the parties are agnates and close door neighbours. It is also submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is evident that there was free fight between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries in the occurrence. Learned counsel further submits that injuries on the person of all the injured are found to be simple in nature. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

¶23

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶24

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63304 of 2023(3) dt.06-12-2023 3/3

¶26

six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in Fulwariya PS Case No.57 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶27

The application stands allowed.

¶28

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶29

J. Alam/-

¶30

Rajnandini Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnandini Kumari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narayan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through the Executive Engineer

Jagdish Mahto and Ors. Vs Manmati Devi and Ors.

Deo Narayan Haith Vs Binodanand Jha

Madhav Mishra @ Madhavnand Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Narayan Rai @ Kunkun Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Renu Devi Vs The State of Bihar