Petitioners sought quashing of a complaint case arising from Lakhisarai. Counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the application, which the court granted and dismissed the quashing application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw granted; quashing application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6115 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2014 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singhapp ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6115 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2023 2/2
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Ram Murti Prasad Verma
Ramotar Prasad Verma @ Ramotar Verma
Parmanand Verma @ Pramanand Verma
Asha Devi
Laxmi Kumari @ Guriya
Nitesh Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar Verma
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
