In Criminal Miscellaneous No.5677 of 2018, the Patna High Court rejected a quashing application filed by Ashok Mallah arising out of a police complaint case filed by the State of Bihar and others, finding no merit in the petition.
The quashing application is rejected and the impugned order is upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5677 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2017 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia
======================================================
Ashok Mallah S/o Late Dukha Mallah, R/o Village- Kunwari, Gram Panchayat- Ramnagar Farsahi Farsahi Milik, Ward No. 7, P.S.- Banmankhi, District- Purnia.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Praveen, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has merit?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Mallah
The State Of Bihar
Mohd. Masoom Raza
Rupesh Kumar
Manish Kumar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
