The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a theft case under Section 379 IPC. The petitioner was ordered to furnish bail bonds with two sureties and mark attendance at Barachati Police Station.
Released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; mandatory attendance at police station.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50669 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2022 Thana- PUNPUN District- Patna
======================================================
Praveen Yadav @ Pravin Yadav S/O Mithilesh Yadav R/O Village- Darbar, P.S. Barachati, Dist.- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Saxena, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 11-10-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50669 of 2023(3) dt.11-10-2023 2/2
of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Masaurhi in connection with Punpun P.S. Case No. 345 of 2022.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the theft case under Section 379 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Praveen Yadav @ Pravin Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
