The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused in a case under IPC 363, 366A and POCSO sections. The court directed him to furnish surety bonds before the Special Judge.
Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the Special Judge POCSO.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49753 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran
======================================================
Lalsaheb @ Lalsaheb Turaha Son of Ashok Turaha @ Ashok Sah Resident of village - Ramdham Mandir, ward no. 26, P.S. - Bagaha, Distt. - West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 11-10-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil
Prasad Singh, learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49753 of 2023(3) dt.11-10-2023 2/2
13.05.2023.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case under Sections 363, 366A of IPC and Sections 4 and 8 of the POCSO Act.
Whether the petitioner satisfies the bail conditions despite being the accused in an abduction and child sexual offences case.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Lalsaheb @ Lalsaheb Turaha
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
