Petitioner sought relief in a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a Darbhanga complaint case, but no one appeared for him and the State noted the case was old. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50120 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-919 Year-2016 Thana- DARBHANGA COMPLAINT CASE District- Darbhanga
======================================================
Sushil Chaupal S/o Baidyanath Chaupal, R/o Village- Pachadhi, P.S.- Raiyam, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
that the case is old, as such, it appears that petitioner has lost interest in the case.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U
Sushil Chaupal S/o Baidyanath Chaupal
The State Of Bihar
Ram Udit Das @ Mauni Baba
Vimal Jha
Basudeo Jha
Natwar Mishra
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
