The High Court of Patna granted the petitioners permission to withdraw their quashing application disposed the matter accordingly. It dismissed the application as withdrawn without adjudicating on the merits of the underlying PS case involving accused Samsher and Afroz.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11028 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-424 Year-2013 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harun Quareshi, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some
arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present quashing application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
SUMIT/- U T
MD. SAMSHER @ MD. MANTU
M. Afroz @ Md. Pappu
The State of Bihar
Ram Dev Yadav
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
