Allowed

Md. Nasim @ Md. Nasim Alam v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Mar 2023CR. MISC./45515/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner accused of dowry death and culpable homicide. The court ordered release on a bond with two sureties subject to conditions regarding trial cooperation, evidence tampering, and verification of antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions of trial cooperation and evidence safety.

Md. Nasim @ Md. Nasim Alam Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45515 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Nasim @ Md. Nasim Alam Son Of Abbash Ansari R/O VillageHardiyabad, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 21-03-2023

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶13

counsel appearing on behalf of the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶15

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

According to prosecution case, the petitioner along with other accused persons have killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45515 of 2022(5) dt.21-03-2023 2/3

¶19

implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He further submits that the petitioner has never demanded any dowry from the family members of his wife. He further submits that in fact, the victim has committed suicide herself and it has come during investigation in paragraph nos. 25 and 98 of the case diary that due to some dispute, the victim has committed suicide herself. He further submits that the postmortem report also suggests that the death was caused due to hanging and no external injuries were found on the body of the deceased. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2022.

¶20

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 208 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

¶22

Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45515 of 2022(5) dt.21-03-2023 3/3

¶24

shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶25

If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶28

Vanisha/-

¶29

U T

Md. Nasim @ Md. Nasim Alam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Nasim @ Md. Nasim Alam v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Kumar @ Raj Tilak Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Kumar @ Vinit @ Vinit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Bajrangi Prasad Kuwar Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Tiwari @ Mohan Kumar @ Mohan Vs The State of Bihar