Allowed

Vicky Kumar @ Vinit @ Vinit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Mar 2023CR. MISC./32753/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On 20-03-2023, this court released the petitioner on bail after framing of charges in a case involving dowry death. The court granted bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 subject to conditions regarding trial cooperation, preventing evidence tampering, and antecedent verification.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below.

Vicky Kumar @ Vinit @ Vinit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32753 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2021 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VICKY KUMAR @ VINIT @ VINIT KUMAR S/o Sri Chandeshwar Mahto Resident of Rampur Nahar Par Mahabir Asthan, P.S.- Bahadurpur, DistrictPatna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vaishnavi Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶8

5 20-03-2023

¶9

Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶10

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

According to prosecution case, there is allegation against the petitioner that he along with other co-accused persons committed murder of the deceased due to nonfulfillment of the demand of dowry.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case on the ground that the petitioner is

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32753 of 2022(5) dt.20-03-2023 2/3

¶14

husband of the victim. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and in fact the victim has committed suicide herself. He further submits that it has come during investigation in paragraph 35 and 36 of the case diary that the victim has committed suicide herself and the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2021.

¶15

Vide order dated 13.02.2023 a report was called for with regard to the stage of the trial. Report dated 17.02.2023 reveals that the record of the present case has been sent to the court of Sessions on 16.02.2023 and the case is pending for framing of charge.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the report, the trial is not likely to be completed in near future and the petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2021.

¶17

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail, after framing of charge, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32753 of 2022(5) dt.20-03-2023 3/3

¶20

satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 115 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-

¶21

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶22

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶23

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶24

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶25

amit/-

¶26

U T

Vicky Kumar @ Vinit @ Vinit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vicky Kumar @ Vinit @ Vinit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivnath Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Gourav Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar @ Raj Tilak Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharam Nath Yadav @ Dharm Nath Prasad Yadav Vs The State of Bihar