Allowed

Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Jul 2023CR. MISC./44754/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under section 412 IPC for allegedly selling a snatched stolen motorcycle; name surfaced via co-accused's confession and petitioner in custody since October 2022. Court granted regular bail on furnishing bail bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount before CJM, Bhojpur at Ara.

Vikash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44754 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-576 Year-2022 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR S/O AJAY YADAV R/O Village- Suari, P.SAgion(Garhani), Distt.- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raju Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akbar Ali ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 28-07-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

It is a case of snatching of motorcycle by three unknown miscreants. It is further alleged that on protest made by the informant, accused person assaulted him by means of rod resulting into head fracture. Allegedly, petitioner in connivance with two other accused persons sold out the said stolen motorcycle to Jugeshwar Chaudhary.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44754 of 2023(2) dt.28-07-2023 2/2

¶17

His name transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Mantu Kumar, who was granted bail by the learned lower court. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 14.10.2022.

¶18

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Koilwar PS Case NO. 576 of 2022.

¶20

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶21

sushma/- U

Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lallu Shah @ Lallu Sao @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bihari Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav @ Guddu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar