In a quashing application regarding a criminal case where charges were framed and trial was ongoing, the High Court held that it should not interfere with the trial at the evidence stage and rejected the application.
Application for quashing stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44346 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3334 Year-2016 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
learned APP for the State.
the case, the learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly submits that the charges have been framed, trial has commenced and the case is at the stage of evidence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44346 of 2017(3) dt.28-11-2023 2/2
should not interfere with the trial.
APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to entertain the quashing application.
5. Accordingly, the present quashing application
stands rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash criminal proceedings where charges have been framed and trial is at the evidence stage.
Whether the statute bars interference at the evidence stage of a criminal trial.
Subhash Sah @ Subhash Kumar
Prem Sagar Sah @ Prem Sagar Kumar
Raghuwan Kumar @ Raghubansh Kumar
Daya Sagar Sah
Hari Kishore Sah @ Hari Sah
State Of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
