Petitioner, acquitted of the offences charged in the underlying case, sought to withdraw his criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4398 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2018 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad
======================================================
ASHOK BIND @ ASHOK KUMAR Son of Sri Bideshi Bind Resident of Village - Pandui Tola Bigha, P.S.- Paras Bihga, Distt - Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nitya Nand Neeraj, Advocate Ms. Rashmi Kumari, Advocate Mr. Mandilwar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammed Arif, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
In view of the above-mentioned prayer, the matter stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Shailendra Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U T
Ashok Bind @ Ashok Kumar
The State of Bihar
Shailendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
