Oral order in a criminal miscellaneous petition where the Petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates, leading the Court to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17968 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2019 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur
====================================================== RAHUL THAKUR, son of Vinod Thakur, resident of village- Dih Belsandi, P.S. Vibhutipur, District, Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 14-02-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner when the
case is called out and on last date also, no one appeared which shows that the petitioner has lost his interest in this case.
Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Shailendra Singh, J)
Sanjay/-
U
Rahul Thakur
The State of Bihar
Shailendra Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
