Allowed

Abdullah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2023CR. MISC./4379/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing multiple charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court directed their release upon furnishing a personal bond to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, complying with section 438(2) of CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail by furnishing personal bond to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria.

Abdullah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4379 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2022 Thana- PALASI District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. ABDULLAH Son of Late Serajuddin R/V- Chhapaniya, Ward no. 3, P.SPalasi, Dist- Araria

¶5

Imajuddin Son of Hazi Sausuddin R/V- Chhapaniya, Ward no. 3, P.S- Palasi, Dist- Araria

¶6

Bibi Farida @ Bibi Farida Khatoon Wife of Imazuddin R/V- Chhapaniya, Ward no. 3, P.S- Palasi, Dist- Araria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

counsel for the State.

¶15

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 299 of 2022 registered for the offence under sections 341, 323, 354B, 312, 313, 498A, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the first information report and they have been falsely implicated in this case merely because they are relatives of the husband of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4379 of 2023(2) dt.03-05-2023 2/2

¶18

informant. Nothing specific is alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistate I, Araria in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 299 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶21

mcv/-

¶22

U T

Abdullah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdullah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Zahan Jeb @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Indu Devi @ Maya Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Subhash Kumar Tiwary @ Subash Tiwari @ Subhash Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Sah Vs the State of Bihar

Ghanshyam Mahto @ Ghanshyam Mehta Vs The State of Bihar