In a bail application arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 IPC, the court refused to enlarge the petitioner because the trial court report indicated the trial was at the verge of conclusion. Directions were issued to expedite the trial.
Bail prayer refused; directions to expedite and conclude the trial issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4290 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2022 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria
======================================================
AJIT SHARMA Son of Sanjay Sharma R/V- Beldaur, P.S- Beldaur, DistKhagaria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
7 11-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4290 of 2023(7) dt.11-09-2023 2/2
FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner be enlarged on bail considering the trial is at the verge of conclusion.
Whether the learned Trial Court be directed to expedite the trial in the present case.
AJIT SHARMA
The State of Bihar
RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
