Allowed

Vishal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2023CR. MISC./14566/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under NDPS and IPC sections for recovery of about 1.5 kg Ganja, a knife and mobile phones. Court noted custody period since 17.06.2022, contraband below commercial quantity, FSL report confirming Ganja, and granted bail with conditions including cooperation, no tampering and antecedents verification.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-V, East Champaran, Motihari.

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14566 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2022 Thana- KUNDWACHAINPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VISHAL KUMAR S/O HIRALAL SAH R/v- Kharua, P.S.- Kundwa Chainpur, district- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

THE UNION OF INDIA, N.D.P.S. Act

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s :

¶13

Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh,APP

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 11-09-2023

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶18

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.06.2022 in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 17.06.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 20(b)ii/23(b)/25 of N.D.P.S.Act.

¶20

On search, in the pocket of petitioner, one knife, two mobile phone and from bag Ganja near about 1 Kg and 500 Gm was recovered.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that from a

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14566 of 2023(5) dt.11-09-2023 2/3

¶23

bare perusal of the FIR as well as seizure list that one knife, two mobile phone and 1 Kg and 500 Gm of Ganja have been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is non-compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act and without F.S.L. report, the police has filed the chargesheet against the petitioner and the recovered contraband is less than the commercial quantity so there is no embargo under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S.Act to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the F.S.L. report dated 02.09.2023 and the chargesheet has been filed prior to the F.S.L. report and the petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2022.

¶24

Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the F.S.L. report confirms that the recovered contraband is Ganja and apart from the aforesaid, the petitioner carries four more cases other than the present one.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-V, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Kundwa Chainpur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2022

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14566 of 2023(5) dt.11-09-2023 3/3

¶27

with the following conditions:-

¶28

(I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶29

(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶30

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶31

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶32

Nitesh/-

Vishal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Nath Yadav @ Prabhu Nath Yadav @ Prabha Nath Yadav @ Kanhay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Avinash Kumar Saurav @ Sonu Singh @ Sonu Shikari @ Avinash Kumar Saurabh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Singh @ Golki Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Noorshad @ Don @ Nurshed @ Noorshad Alam @ Noorshad Don Vs The State of Bihar