High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous petition for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner, who had been cautioned to attend subsequent hearings, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42110 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2009 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai
======================================================
Chandan Kumar son of Amiri Rai resident of Village- Daniyalpur, P.S.Teghra, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 20-12-2023 Nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioner(s) despite repeated calls.
the last date, nobody was present on behalf of the Petitioner(s) to attend the matter and the Petitioner(s) was/were cautioned to attend the matter on the next date of hearing. Despite such cautioning, the Petitioner(s) is/are not present to attend the matter, which shows that the Petitioner(s) has/have lost interest to pursue the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42110 of 2016(3) dt.20-12-2023 2/2
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
shoaib/-
U T
Chandan Kumar
State Of Bihar
Satya Narain Mahto
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
