The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates despite repeated calls and cautioning, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34696 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2015 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Virendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
5 19-12-2023 Nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioner despite
repeated calls.
on the last date, nobody was present on behalf of the Petitioner to attend the matter and the Petitioner was cautioned to attend the matter on the next date of hearing. Despite such cautioning, the Petitioner is not present to attend the matter, which shows
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34696 of 2016(5) dt.19-12-2023 2/2
that the Petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present case.
default.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
chandan/-
U T
Prof. Rajesh Kumar Choudhary and Ors
State of Bihar and Anr
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
