Allowed

Suryabali Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Sept 2023CR. MISC./41849/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners charged with abduction, abduction of a minor for prostitution, and criminal intimidation/offences under the IPC. The court ordered release upon arrest or surrender within four weeks subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petitioners al

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Suryabali Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41849 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2020 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SURYABALI RAM SON OF LATE RAGHU RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BAUDI, POLICE STATION - GUTHANI, DISTRICT - SIWAN

¶5

MUNNA RAM SON OF BISHRAM RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GANGPALIYA, POLICE STATION - DARAULI, DISTRICT - SIWAN

¶6

FULMALA DEVI WIFE OF MUNNA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GANGPALIYA, POLICE STATION - DARAULI, DISTRICT - SIWAN

¶7

SHOBHA KUMARI DAUGHTER OF MUNNA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GANGPALIYA, POLICE STATION - DARAULI, DISTRICT - SIWAN

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR, PATNA

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the State Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 08-09-2023

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶15

learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 363, 366(A), 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Guthani P.S.Case No. 33 of 2020.

¶17

As per allegation, the petitioners abducted the informant’s minor daughter with some evil intention and abused her.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that they have falsely been implicated merely because they are relatives of co-accused Sonu Kumar aghainst whom

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41849 of 2023(4) dt.08-09-2023 2/2

¶20

there is allegation that he kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.

¶21

On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that the marriage of the victim was not solemnized with co-accused Sonu Kumar, rather it was solemnized with another person, and as per the medical report, the victim is pregnant of five months.

¶22

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-6th-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Siwan in connection with Guthani P.S.Case No. 33 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶23

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

HR/-

¶25

U T

Suryabali Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suryabali Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shailesh Kumar Poddar @ Shailesh Poddar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Jain @ Rajesh Kumar Jain Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kanhaiya Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sappu Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Bhokta @ Saroj Bhogta Vs The State of Bihar