Allowed

Shailesh Kumar Poddar @ Shailesh Poddar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Sept 2023CR. MISC./22313/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Modification application seeking correction of a prior bail order that omitted mention of two pending cases in paragraph 3, owing to the deponent father's oversight and the petitioner's physical disability. The court allowed the modification and directed acceptance of bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 14.12.2021 modified; court below directed to accept petitioner's bail bonds within four weeks subject to prior conditions.

Shailesh Kumar Poddar @ Shailesh Poddar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22313 of 2023

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2021

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2020 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai

¶5

======================================================

¶6

SHAILESH KUMAR PODDAR @ SHAILESH PODDAR SON OF SURENDRA PRASAD PODDAR @ SURENDRA PODDAR RESIDETN OF VILL- PURANI BAZAR ,DHARAMSHALA ROAD, PS LAKHISARAI, DISTT- LAKHISARAI.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 01-09-2023

¶13

This application has been filed for modification of

¶14

order dated 14.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5311 of 2021.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

¶16

as the learned APP for the State.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the father of the petitioner, who is aged about 72 years, is deponent of this case. He is unaware of the pendency of other two cases except those which have been mentioned in paragraph No. 3 of Cr. Misc. No. 5311 of 2021 and due to mistake, those two cases could not be mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of that criminal miscellaneous petition. He has also submitted that the petitioner is a physical disabled person and he has been treated

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22313 of 2023(6) dt.01-09-2023 2/2

¶19

upto A.I.I.M.S, Delhi, so he deserves sympathy.

¶20

On the other hand, the learned APP and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 have opposed the prayer for bail. The learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has stated that the petitioner has intentionally concealed his two criminal cases.

¶21

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the physical condition of the petitioner, this modification application is allowed and the order dated 14.12.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5311 of 2021 is modified to the extent of criminal antecedents mentioned in paragraph no. 8.

¶22

The learned court below is directed to accept the bail bonds of the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks subject to other conditions mentioned in Cr. Misc. No. 5311 of 2021.

¶23

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶24

Mahesh/-

¶25

U T

Shailesh Kumar Poddar @ Shailesh Poddar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Kumar Poddar @ Shailesh Poddar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Gupta and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bibi Shairoon Vs The State of Bihar

Saurav Sah @ Sourw Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Jain @ Rajesh Kumar Jain Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Premchand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar