Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application, the Patna High Court refused bail to the petitioner being a gang member involved in large-scale cheating. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed with direction to trial court to expedite trial.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41644 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2023 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia
======================================================
AMIT KUMAR @ AMIT KUMAR RAM Son of Rajendra Ram Resident of Village - Pothia, P.S.- Amour, District – Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 06-09-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
- This application has been filed for grant of regular bail in connection with Amour P.S. Case No. 105 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 417, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 25.03.2023.
- As per prosecution, the petitioner and other criminals were caught by the police who disclosed before the police that they used to download the sale deed of other states. Thereafter, from the sale deed they obtain the fingerprints and Aadhar Number and by making duplicate fingerprint using rubber seal used to withdraw the money from the accounts of the person whose fingerprint were downloaded. The screen shot
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with offences under Sections 417, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 120(B) of the IPC.
Whether the trial should be expedited for the petitioner currently in judicial custody.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Ram
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sandeep Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court