Habibur Rahman @ Md.habibur Rahman v. Abdul Khalik
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a petition challenging an order accepting a compromise in execution proceedings. The petitioner argued that a 2003 compromise was illegal because it included an extra decimal of land. The single-judge bench held that parties could include other land in a compromise after a decree and found the impugned order legal.
What did the court decide?
The petition setting aside the order accepting the compromise petition was dismissed.