Dismissed

Dharmendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jan 2023CR. MISC./40239/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court considered a prayer for anticipatory bail. The petitioner, owner of the vehicle from which excise goods were seized, alleged false implication. The Court rejected the plea, holding the petitioner did not deserve anticipatory bail due to the nature of allegations.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected. Bail is denied.

Dharmendra Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40239 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2022 Thana- DEO District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHARMENDRA PASWAN Son of Suryadev Paswan Resident of villageAnarua Kala Khurd P.S.- Hariharganj, District- Palamu, Jharkhand

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 17-01-2023

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the State.

¶12

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 89 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise and Prohibition Amended Act, 2018.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case merely because he is the owner of the seized Pulsar Motorcycle No. JH03AF-5322 from which the alleged recovery has been made. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶14

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for

¶15

the State opposes the prayer of bail and submits that petitioner is

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40239 of 2022(3) dt.17-01-2023 2/2

¶17

the owner of the vehicle from which the alleged recovery has been made. He therefore submits that the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

¶18

Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner an the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected.

¶19

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶20

anuradha/U T

Dharmendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neeraj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Himayum@ Humayu@ Humayun Vs the State of Bihar

Triloki Bhuiyan Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Adil Vs The State of Bihar

Raghubir Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeet Sahani Vs The State of Bihar