This oral order grants the petitioner permission to withdraw the quashing application, resulting in the dismissal of the present application and no substantive ruling on any legal issue.
Permission to withdraw the quashing application accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39210 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2012 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR District- Patna
======================================================
Shashi Ranjan Kumar Pandey Son of Late Ganesh Pandey, R/o VillageSadaua, P.S.- Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance E. O. U
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Babita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vijay Anand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
Spl.P.P. for the E.O.U, Mr. Vijay Anand.
arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise all issues at the time of framing of charge.
3 . Permission is accorded.
4 . Accordingly, the present quashing application is
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
SUMIT/-
U T
Shashi Ranjan Kumar Pandey
The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance E. O. U
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
