Petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls on the hearing date and previously, indicating loss of interest in prosecuting the case. The petition was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37300 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1150 Year-2015 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 02-11-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the Petitioners despite
repeated calls.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37300 of 2016(3) dt.02-11-2023 2/2
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
ramesh/-
U
Sri Pushkar Narayan Bhargava and Ors
Shashi Bala Bhargava
Jyoti Sinha
Virji Ranaji
Neeta Bhargava
Kumar Pulkeshin
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
