Petitioners absent on repeated dates in a criminal miscellaneous petition arising from a Saharsa complaint case; the High Court found the petitioners had lost interest and dismissed the petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35620 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3722 Year-2015 Thana- SAHARSA COMPLAINT CASE
District- Saharsa
====================================================== Dinesh Sharma and Ors ... ... Petitioner/s Versus State Of Bihar and Anr ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 01-11-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
(Jitendra Kumar, J)
ravikr/-
U T
Dinesh Sharma and Ors
State Of Bihar
Anr
Jitendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
