Allowed

Shivpujan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2023CR. MISC./32229/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application in a POCSO case involving alleged sexual assault on a 12-year-old girl. With the petitioner in custody since April 2022 and the charge-sheet already submitted, the court granted bail with two sureties under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Shivpujan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32229 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2022 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shivpujan Kumar Son of Sanjay Das Resident of Village - Bankat, P.S. - Bankey Bazar, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 14-02-2023

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Notice is duly served upon but the informant fails to join present proceedings.

¶15

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raushanganj (Bankeybazar) P.S. Case No. 68 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 342, 323, 354(A) and 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'I.P.C.') and under Sections 08 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

¶17

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 09.04.2022.

¶18

The allegation against the petitioner is to commit

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32229 of 2022(4) dt.14-02-2023 2/3

¶20

sexual assault upon the minor daughter of the informant, aged about 12 years, while she was returning to her home at about 6 p.m. after finishing her outdoor game.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the implication is purely based upon previous enmities since uncle of petitioner lodged a case against father of the victim/informant of this case which was registered as Raushanganj (Bankeybazar) P.S. Case No. 35 of 2013. It is submitted that from the statement of victim, as recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., it is difficult to gathered that the assault was made with sexual intent. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

¶22

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

¶23

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned

¶24

above and by taking note of the nature of allegation, where petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2022 coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Raushanganj (Bankeybazar) P.S. Case No. 68 of 2022 on

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32229 of 2022(4) dt.14-02-2023 3/3

¶26

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Court (POSCO)-cum-A.D.J. VII, Gaya/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C.

¶27

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶28

pooja/-

¶29

U T

Shivpujan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivpujan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shekh Nurzan Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Birendra Jha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Sharma @ Ram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Muni Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Baua Yadav @ Shashi Kumar Vs the State of Bihar