Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner was falsely implicated in this case out of neighbourhood disputes and differences. It is further submitted that the implication was to create a legal pressure to negotiate marriage with petitioner. It is also submitted that from bare perusal of statement of victim, as recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., as mentioned in para 30 of the case diary, it appears that mere an attempt was made on behalf of petitioner and it is not a case of penetrative sexual assault. It is also submitted that it is quite impossible to enter into a room, which was admittedly, locked from inside and lift the victim up to roof as alleged. While treavelling over the argument, it is submitted that nothing adverse can be gathered from the medical report of the victim, where no recent sexual assault was noticed. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.